Framework Agreement With Nscn Im

09 Déc Framework Agreement With Nscn Im

« In keeping with the position of the other, shared sovereignty has been defined in jurisdiction. As a result, the powers have defined how to share parts of Naga`s sovereignty and vice versa with the Union of India, » said the NSCN. In a statement sent Sunday night to DH, the outfit also released an additional copy of the framework agreement, which was manipulated and shared with other Naga groups, according to its own claims, such as the Naga National Political Groups (NNPG), a forum of seven other rebel groups, on hold to give another narrative. According to a report by The Hindu, there was unease in parts of Nagaland after the government decided to take over other Naga armed groups under the aegis of the Naga National Political Groups (NNGP). The report notes that some sections of Nagaland suspect that this was done by the government to exploit existing divisions between the Nagas. R.N. Ravi will meet with the representatives of the six… He said: « With `included`, this means that all Naga must be included in the agreement in different administrative units and political camps. The coexistence of the two entities is self-explanatory. This means that the two peoples and the two nations will coexist.

Political and legal experts recognize that the concepts of « coexistence » and « shared sovereignty » apply to two entities, not one. The Nagas will co-exist with India, which shares sovereign powers, as agreed in the framework agreement and defined in jurisdiction. But they will not merge with India. One of the intentions is to highlight the lack of confidence in Ravi, especially because he « manipulated » the peace process. According to the NSCN, he distributed another copy of the CEW to influential Naga civil society groups (CSOs) with whom he consulted for their contributions on the matter, as well as approval of the conditions he had set for the peace agreement. The original copy was also not shared with the seven Naga National Political Groups (NNPG) who were then brought to the negotiating table. Mr Ravi signed the agreement on behalf of the Centre in the presence of Prime Minister Narendra Modi. The other two signatories were Isak Chishi Swu, who died in 2016, and Thuingaleng Muivah, 86, who is leading the talks. « We had a bitter and bloody experience of the 16-point agreement and the Shillong agreement. » The sensitive point is that Ravi, in complete contradiction with the framework agreement, presented a misleading report to the Standing Parliamentary Committee, » the panel said. It considered that such reports, which are not related to an agreement with the NSCN negotiating team, have now become a source of pain in political discussions between Indo-Naga. Addressing the people of Naga on 14 August, which he celebrated as independence day after British rule with his own flag, Muivah said on the eve of India`s Independence Day: « The agreement also says: « Including the peaceful coexistence of the two entities that share sovereign power. » The framework agreement, which was shared on Tuesday in a detailed press release from NSCN-IM, states that « both sides have understood each other`s respective positions and are aware of the universal principle that, in a democracy, sovereignty belongs to the people. As a result, on 3 August 2015, the Indian government and the NSCN, which respects the aspirations of citizens for sovereign power as defined in the powers, reached an agreement as an honourable solution.

On the one hand, the fact that the idea of the NSCN (I-M) – nagalim – includes parts of Arunachal Pradesh, Assam and Manipur has alerted the states. Civil society organizations in the three states said that no compromise on their territorial integrity would be accepted. But they have reason to be cautious, because the NSCN (I-M) is considered one of the largest rebel groups on the subcontinent with access to sophisticated weapons, their actions will inevitably have negative effects on states.